First things first. There is a lot
of language that I have put out into the world and not all of it is honest and constructive/creative/life-giving.
This is natural and to be expected. This is also a problem. While most human
beings, and even many academics, see language as the great human equalizer (our
[il]literacy puts us all on the same meaning-making/transferring playing field),
I have recently begun to recognize the mammoth responsibility we as people
inherit when we learn to speak and, as an extension, write. Okay so words are
placeholders for images, objects, concepts, idea[l]s, and so forth. I’m totally
fine with this. But when we use language irresponsibly (when we create word
patterns that mislead or tear down our brother and sister humans) there are
implications.
An immediate example comes to mind
when I think of advertising. When people use language to build false meanings
for consumer objects, something in the meaning-making part of our brains shifts
and augments future language/experience/feelings. If I, as I often do as a
copywriter, use the human feeling of passion to help advertise an automobile,
both the concept of passion and the concept of automobiles change in the minds
of myself and my readers (hopefully no one reads my copy). As a result, I fear
readers might do one of the following things (or, eventually, all of them):
1.
Actually start equating passion with automobiles
(I’m not worried about car-enthusiasts here. If someone actually loves cars, my
words will do nothing to change their beliefs. It’s the people who don’t love
cars but start think they should because I say they should that I’m worried
about. There is nothing about owning an automobile that will make a person more
or less passionate about anything except fuel-consumption).
2.
After recognizing that discounted automobiles
should not raise passion-levels to heights of say, romantic love or patriotic
duty (as I often imply they should in my advertisements), stop believing in
passion at all (because when they did believe in passion, some irresponsible
writer twisted their notions to try to sell them a 1998 Honda Civic).
3.
After recognizing that deceptive language
perverted their dearly held beliefs, stop trusting language and language makers
in general and not truly read or feel anything (just in case someone is trying
to pull a fast one on them).
Writers need to be honest with their language (or, if they’re
going to lie, at least let the lies be of benefit to their readers, i.e., “everything
is going to be okay,” etc.). To make a living I put words out into space that
might not be the best things for people to read. I feel bad about this and hope
readers are wise enough to see deceitful language for what it is (mainly hair
grease, smoke and mirrors, and the best I can do to get by). For those that
aren’t wise enough, I hope to make up for my irresponsible language with words
that actually do something positive for the collective. It is with this hope
that I offer the following apology:
Forgive me for the words
I drained of ocean
water and candle light.
They were the only ones
I could find on
sale this time of year. Also,
forgive me for buying
them with unearned coin
and even more for selling
them to the unsuspecting
thirsty and dark.
I thought this unspoken
business was the only way
to speak. I am rich because
of it and no less
mistaken.
You are forgiven.
ReplyDeleteI thought poetry was rhyming couplets. Is that writing called free verse for writers who can’t rhyme?
ReplyDeleteI thought poetry was rhyming couplets. Is that writing called free verse for writers who can’t rhyme?
ReplyDelete